Good reasons to do nothing #9s143

If you are bothered by a third party narrating your movements through the wall (let’s not discuss the multiplicity of devices which may be used to accomplish such a purpose), therefore you are a spy,  because other people would have nothing to hide.

So what is it, do foreign governments have a legitimate right to invade your every every, or … is there no problem?


Also, if you know that it’s a crime (up to 10 years in prison) to try to blackmail people, and you make this observation while someone is trying to blackmail you, this is evidence that you’re guilty of whatever they say. This then legitimizes up to 100% invasive attention, because pointing out that what someone is doing is consistent with blackmail is evidence that you must be guilty of something.

For which reasons private citizens must take it upon themselves to criminally harass you for any possible accusation until the threat of continued mental tortures may itself serve as the blackmail.

Which is kind of more like criminal harassment (up to 5 years) and blackmail (up to 10 years), but anyways … what the hell does the law have to do with blackmail?

Posted in Arts, media & society, Courts/police/justice, Physics, Policy, Quotidian, Science, Web and computing | Leave a comment

Please redirect pro-liberty struggle towards modelling (text data mining) global issues of my choosing

1) Please desist from all activities related to technologies which control or influence people’s thoughts against their will. In particular, please desist from those activities which promote citizens’ awareness of such technologies, and most especially when presenting such technologies as a threat to their cognitive liberty.

2) Please go learn how to scrape websites for large volumes of political, history and global affairs content, which will serve as an excellent and suitable basis for your technological advancement with regard to word analysis of such content. It will help your professional advancement or something. (Also, I’ve pre-planned 100,000 ways to screw you up while trying to learn which commands to use in applying high school math, and in the meantime, it will waste lots and lots of your time while … gee, are we back at the same theme of mental or other forms of enslavement?)

The second of these measures will be useful in case there is an Armageddon, and you need to be pre-prepared to scrape large volumes of text from websites, in preparation for a potential need for offline analysis of the world. For which reason immediately dropping all other activities – to redirect efforts towards learning to data mine text related to political, historical and/or global affairs – might be expected to improve your overall wellbeing and security. For example, if there is an Armageddon, a private citizen who is a civilian may require to be pre-prepared to do so things.


Also, the screwing with you at key moments of professional relevance may come to an end. In particular, there is a possibility that choosing the times of maximum fucking-with may be reoriented, relatively speaking, away from critical junctures when performing professional activities. For example, if there were more openness to being guided by the principle of never commenting with even the vaguest hint of critical attitude about anything done by US military or intelligence, unless it could be extensively pre-analyzed such that critical innuendo might in balance improve their credibility … yes, if there were more of this openness, a reasonable and just person might consider to be a little less vigorous and thorough in various tortures and crimes perpetrated on an ongoing basis, variously directed towards the implosion and professional destruction of the individual who does not ‘roll over well’ and who thinks that their own mental enslavement would be something to have a problem with.

Of course, in retrospect, “China” knows you’d never fall for such bullshit which would amount to your mental enslavement of de facto being puppeted, so in retrospect it should be remembered as non-credible, a joke maybe, or at least not something to remember as threatening to the self. Perhaps designed to make you aware of certain risks? And, to help you, and all mankind, of course.

(P.S. – but maaaybe, probably not (?) but maaaybe, straight up, if you just totally self censor, at least for a relatively extended period of time, then maybe you’ll find out something.)

Posted in Arts, media & society, Courts/police/justice, Economics, pure theory, Epistemology, History, Philosophy, Physics, Policy, Political philosophy, Political science, Quotidian, Science, Web and computing | Leave a comment

A history of the Anti-Brainwashing League on Facebook

Day 1: Point out that the Canadian Medical Association’s statements on marijuana legalization quoted their own OPINION piece, and did not cite any actual science.

Day 1: Banned for 2 days for no reason that I was able to find out.

Day 3: Joined multiple groups, all related to organized stalking, etc.

Day 3: Banned for 2 weeks for joining too many groups in the same day.

Day 17: Joined multiple groups, all related to organized stalking, etc.

Day 17: Banned for 2 more weeks for joining too many groups in the same day.

Day 31: Privileges restored.

Day 35: Permanent ban of Anti-Brainwashing League under the premise of not being a person, after responding to much propaganda and misinformation posted by persons operating presumably fake accounts.


Upside: I have now discovered a way to delete a Facebook account, considering that someone appears to have set the settings at the Facebook database such that no matter how many correct answers I give to decodable images, I receive only messages indicating that one of either a) the password or b) the decoding of the image are incorrect. This leaves me with the options of entering one or more possible alternative passwords, or to continue with the step which is apparently programmed or set not to work to allow to delete my account.

However, with the option of simply changing my name to “Anti-Brainwashing League” and repeating the above steps, the world of possibilities will expand significantly, including both ‘Facebook deleted’ and ‘Facebook not deleted’ situations.

Posted in Arts, media & society, Political philosophy, Quotidian, Web and computing | Leave a comment

How not to build a culture of tax compliance (among other “how not to’s” consistent with the following)

1) Tolerance for tax evasion is higher when government competence is lower.

2) Tolerance for tax evasion is higher when (loosely) pressure of monitoring is higher.

3) Thus, it may be concluded that hostile levels of monitoring by non-tax officials (or others) under a claim of working to benefit tax revenues in a manner that effectively demonstrates state incompetence can be assumed to have a strongly undesirable effect on preferences for tax compliance (among other things).

4) In the case that the individual is relatively poorer, the effect may be less because they benefit (more?) from public services and would generally retain a preference for overall relatively high tax compliance enforcement on the part of officials authorized to do so. In the case that the individual is relatively wealthy, treatment as mentioned above would tend to exacerbate the situation yet further, combining multiple causes for tolerance of evading payment of taxes to a particular government at the same time as having a relatively high pecuniary interest to do so themselves.

5) This can be cited in a context where compartmentalization of information of citizens with respect to certain segments of at least some governments appears to have fallen apart into a complete centralization of information. The context is also one where in recent years efforts by ultra-wealthy to evade the Canadian tax man have gone through the roof, estimated to have a net cost to the public purse running well into the billions of dollars at a time when fewer resources were allocated to genuine investigations.

(Reference for 1), 2) and 4): “Tolerance for Tax Evasion”)

Posted in Arts, media & society, Courts/police/justice, Economics, pure theory, Philosophy, Physics, Policy, Political philosophy, Quotidian, Science, Web and computing | Leave a comment

The most potent weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed

The most potent weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.” – Steven Biko

Posted in Arts, media & society, Courts/police/justice, Epistemology, Philosophy, Political philosophy, Quotidian, Web and computing | Leave a comment

Neurowar puppetry tactics. A.k.a. “Who the hell programmed that?”

The tactic referred to here is to try to force very numerous estimated-as-maybe-would-say things into your mind, so as to prevent from being able to gather thoughts to the extent to say or think what you actually want to say or think.

Eventually, the victim may become tired or frustrated enough that they will eventually tolerate to say or think basically whatever is projected into their mind. Combinations of sticks and carrots may be applied to reinforce habituation to quasi-willing compliance with this.


Wanting to suggest to someone that they can use another approach to something. But then, facing enormous difficulty bringing to fruition thought processes other than those which promote to say so in a way that involves excessive deference and bending over (generally speaking, to self-position weakly in the case that an offensive domineering approach cannot be promoted). This, followed by attempts to project numerous possible explanations for what one might actually WANT to say, in order to deeply mine for thinking processes for purposes of further puppetry efforts in the future, in particular to evaluate whether some diversity of explanatory approaches might seem reasonable and thus implantable into the victim.

Generally speaking here, I refer to the insanely evil crimes of intentionally filling people’s heads with words, explanatory approaches, etc. other than their own, explicitly for the purpose of wearing them out to the point that they will no longer care if the words that come out of their mouth and the thoughts which go through their head are their own.

(This entry should be read in conjunction with the entry on “coercive thought reform” in the glossary that can be downloaded here).

Posted in Arts, media & society, Courts/police/justice, Economics, pure theory, Epistemology, History, International, Philosophy, Physics, Political philosophy, Political science, Quotidian, Science, Web and computing | Leave a comment

Innocent pranks of the sort that do not land people in prison

Credits to:,,, and


1) Make a friend orange juice, but it’s made using the cheese from Kraft Dinner instead of being orange juice.

ha ha ha

2) When visiting a friend, set up multiple alarms in their room to go off very early the next day.

ha ha ha.

And then call them and invite them to breakfast.

3) Invite religious missionaires to come bring them the message.

4) Make them a candied apple. But it’s an onion inside.

5) Set your friend’s spellcheck on their phone to ensure embarassing spellings of commonly used words.

ha ha ha.

6) Position an airhorn under their office chair so it goes off the next time they sit down at it.

ha ha ha.

7) Place jolly ranchers in the showerhead and make sure that the accessible towel comes heavily a la lint.

ha ha ha.

(For days where there is sure to be extra time …)

8) Place all their work supplies inside balloons and blow them up.

9) Replace the icing in oreos with toothpaste and serve to friends or family.

ha ha ha.

10) Make doughnuts with filling, but the filling is mayonnaise.

11) Place bubble-wrap under their rugs.

12) Place glue in their hand sanitizer bottle.

13) Send them admissions acceptance letters to Hogwartz.

14) Fill an empty mayonnaise jar with pudding, and then arrange to be eating this “mayonnaise” out of the jar when they are over.

15) Glue coins to the floor.

16) Completely paint their bar of soap with nail polish, so it will not lather.

17) Set the screen on their computer to upside down. (Maybe leave a note that isn’t too unlikely to find, explaining how to undo this.)

18) Make cookies with salt instead of sugar, and then share.

19) Prepare cereal the night ahead, placing it in the freezer. Then serve it for breakfast and watch.

20) Stuff a napkin at the end of someone’s shoes so it’s like their shoes got smaller. Extension: do it to all of their shoes.

21) Put a notice on a new appliance at work informing that it is voice activated.

22) Bring them a box of fried snacks, but then inside there are only fresh veggies.

23) Prepare a can of pop with a straw to drink from it, but first stick the straw into ketchup and suck ketchup into the straw. Their first sip will be pure ketchup.

ha ha ha.

24) Spill paint or nail polish onto wax paper and let it dry, then place it on the carpet and watch them freak out.

25) Empty out their deodorant and replace it with cream cheese.

26) Place signs facing out from local coffee shops, instructing them to join in celebration of no pants day and to then walk to the front of the line.

27) Replace the toilet paper with duct tape.

ha ha ha.

(Leave a not-too-invisible towel and bar of soap for the shower.)

28) While taking care of the house for family away on holiday, find a picture to put on their screen that makes it look like it’s totally busted.

29) Show a friend a trick about balancing a glass full of water on the back of their hand. Having mastered one, invite them to try two. Once they have mastered this, leave.

30) Get the same clothes as they wear, but all one size smaller. Invite them to join the gym that day.

31) Put tape over the mouth piece of their phone.

32) Tape down the button on the phone at work so it keeps on ringing after it is picked up.

33) Put food colouring in the soap dispenser in the bathroom.

34) AND … there’s nothing more famous of a prank than to put shit in a paper bag and to light in on fire at someone’s front door and run off as you ring the bell.

That’s gotta be about the line.

Posted in Arts, media & society, Quotidian | Leave a comment

World Economic Forum (the Davos billionaire’s club) advice on what makes a great employee, contrasted with behaviours promoted for “targeted individuals”:

The World Economic Forum published a description of what makes great employees, with a focus on personality aspects. This post is a rough draft which compares a) the main points of advice disseminated by the billionaires’ club with b) behaviours promoted by perpetrators of gang stalking, electronic terrorism, etc., against individuals, many of whom self identify as “targeted individuals”. The article is available here.

– WEF: delaying gratification is good
– TI treatments: seek objects of gratification which may be promoted for immediate departure from an activity (conditioning and brainwashing ‘stick and carrot hunting’ considerations excluded here), or to promote delayed gratification in a manner that allows to use it for ongoing manipulations and distractions or to establish a faux independence while rejecting the gratification while the mentally tired individual is then promoted to do some particular acts which are not in their interest. This is among major areas of relevance in attempts to induce a Stockholm-Syndrome-like outcome between the perpetrator(s) and victim(s).

Job descriptions:
– WEF: promote not to use the “not in my job description” excuse
– TI treatments: promote “not in my job description” behaviour when consistent with preferences of the synthetic telepathy operator or gang stalker or those they are subordinated to; promote substantially exceeding job descriptions when consistent with a habituation to taking ‘initiative’ in generally inappropriate contexts highly liable to lead team members or superiors to doubt their judgement (among others, inclusive of promoting paranoia that consulting with other team members or superiors would make them look dumb or weak, or to promote a maximum appearance of incompetence or irresponsibility in a manner calculated according to known characteristics of those in a position to negatively judge).

Intimidation and entitlement:
– WEF: for intimidation and entitlement to not be relevant, for the purpose of taking responsibility
– TI treatment: in a highly calculated manner, using conditioning and brainwashing techniques (a.k.a. coercive thought reform), promote the ability to manipulate perceptions of intimidation (in order to deter from certain initiatives) and promote entitlement in other areas (in order to promote the individual’s willingness to perform certain inappropriate activities to potentiate further corruption of various sorts, under some variety of alternatively well-intentioned or perhaps hostile pretence according to the personality of the victim).

– WEF: don’t seek conflict, but don’t run away from it
– TI treatment: promote conflict in any way possible especially in highly inappropriate manners considering known aspects of personality of other parties; deter conflict primarily in relation to intimidation and propensity towards either knowing or deluded subordination which may be promoted for the purpose of basically enslaving or puppeting an individual.

– WEF: maintain composure while presenting positions calmly and rationally
– TI treatment: promote hysterics and endeavour in any way possible to increase stress levels and reduce rationality surrounding the entire interaction, suggestively introducing irrational responses liable to raise the level of conflict, and using information about the target’s “would do” or “would say” database, promote positionings which may in the instant appear potentially logical to the individual, but ultimately promote their discrediting both to others and to themselves

“When things start going wrong, don’t forget to fly the plane.”:
– WEF: implicitly promotes to continue flying a plane while something is being addressed, in order to not crash the plane
– TI treatment: routinely promoting any possible means of obsession-level distraction about issues which are potentially relevant to deal with over some timeframe, but specifically in a manner directed towards highly suboptimal re-prioritization on an ongoing basis, including extremely calculated efforts to promote a return to attention or prioritization in a manner that compounds the possibilities to explode the general situation of a victim – in short, at all times seeking minor issues to obsess about in order to ‘forget about flying the plane’.

– WEF: use courage judiciously
– TI treatment: promoting to use courage in situations where benefits are low and risks are high, in particular in a manner that would tend to promote third parties to join in on the hostile treatment against the victim; use of courage in high pay-off low-risk situations is to be deterred, for example by use of said third parties who may now be available for blackmail-oriented generalized intimidation, harassment and mind fucking purposes, such that these high pay-off low-risk applications of courage can then be deterred. More generally, this is consistent with promoting poor prioritization for purposes of general degradation of the individual enroute to enslaved and/or exploded outcomes.

– WEF: exceptional employees always think there is some thing they can make better
– TI treatment: promoting depressive attitudes leading to throw hands up because it is not possible to make anything better; promoting obsessions about improvements that are essentially unimportant; promoting notions that external influences can always be credited for potential objects of satisfaction, for example if you pick up some special item to then regularly promote its use in order to then try to take credit for suggesting it and thus being responsible for that – and then apply conditionings (etc.) in order to promote obsessions or ‘addictions’ in a manner which essentially degrade these potential satisfactions. (In one way of saying it, in the end, all ‘carrots’ should be meaningless except for those associated with compliant puppetry, in particular to be responsive to nothing less than temporary reprieve from computer-generated and other ‘sticks’).

– WEF: Exceptional employees are in control of their egos, specifically to admit mistakes and willingness to do things other people’s way
– TI treatment: well, this is about basically about completely destroying the self of the victim, and potentially enslaving or puppeting them in cases where that is possible, so … what more words can there be on “ego” without writing an entire book on it?
– On the specific matters cited by the WEF, it can be mentioned that victims are deterred from admitting mistakes in situations where this would likely lead to superior outcomes and are promoted to obsess over trivial mistakes of their own in a manner which discredits them or to otherwise promote behaviours regarding shortcomings in workplace outputs which will tend to lead to their unemployment, or at least prevent their advancement; On the matter of willingness to do things other people’s way, this is only promoted in situations where it is consistent with habituation to subservience (to be contrasted with “listen and delegate” approaches to leadership), and in other situations it is to be deterred in conjunction with positive and negative conditionings (etc.) until the victim is habituated to enjoyment of a “power” emotional response which may be manipulated via what domineering and controlling characteristics may be (in some cases additionally) imbued into the victim.

Broken things:
– WEF: fix broken things
– TI treatment: promote to forget about fixing broken things, for example by timed distractions, or to remind about something and then immediately distract from it in a manner that may lead the subconscious to not have cause to think of it for a while. Or, otherwise, to imbue a conditioned (etc.) pain stimulus at the time of this reminder and then distraction. Two main things may be at play: a) building up a multiplicity of small problems by which a complete explosion of the individual may be achieved in some calculated manner (and time), and b) to expand the list of things which may be reprioritized, for the purpose of controlling the timing of activities and to deter from certain priority-to-deter activities.
– I.e., for broken things to serve as a basis for habituation to negative programmings in the process of promoting general explodability, and to expand the possibility set from which ongoing reprioritization may be promoted (for very various purposes)

– WEF: avoid ‘not my fault’ mindsets, worrying more about getting things done than placing blame
– TI treatment: everything is your fault, especially personality flaws which must be the object of both immediate and very ongoing reform until the new you can be birthed from the process. In the process, focus is to be almost exclusively on who to blame and when/where to blame them, in particular because this can be used to promote some variety of “false flags” in the eternal search for ‘whatever it takes to make you do it’, and otherwise to manipulate the personality of the victim in the process of dishing abuses and manipulations upon yet other parties.

Toxic people:
– WEF: neutralize them; keep feelings in check; be rational, not emotional;
– TI treatment: toxic people are an opportunity to promote conflict with the victim, and rapid emotional responses are promoted under pretences of some logic which motivate victims towards this supposedly ‘self’-destructive behaviour. Potential connections with non-toxic people are to be deterred by any any means possible, including intimidation and harassment of the non-toxic potential connections, in order to promote the ability to maintain a high-stress situation for the victim until such a point as they break and are available for puppetry, or otherwise to write off the remaining shell of a human as a welfare case.

Posted in Arts, media & society, Business and entrepreneurship, Courts/police/justice, Development, Economics, pure theory, History, International, Philosophy, Physics, Policy, Political philosophy, Political science, Quotidian, Science, Web and computing | Leave a comment

Clubbing people and throwing piss at them does not tend to win them over

Dignified nonviolent resistance and disciplined civil disobedience are more conducive to demonstrating a sincere ethical commitment to a better, non-racist society than clubbing people and hurling piss at them.

More at Project Syndicate.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Apparently not many criminals are aware of this

Anything to the effect of “I will harass you until you understand that the situation is that I will fuck with you endlessly until I can be sure that you will not report me” – is blackmail.

Blackmail is a serious crime, and in many jurisdictions can attract as much as life in prison depending on the specific circumstances.

Posted in Arts, media & society, Courts/police/justice, Economics, pure theory, Physics, Policy, Quotidian, Science, Web and computing | Leave a comment