This post involves random, imaginary questions about nothing at all to do with reality, a reality where only mentally ill people could believe that such things could be possible at the same time (in particular if not having a pre-courtroom-ready evidentiary basis constructed in the absence of any formal assistance whatsoever).
In short, if something is happening to you, and you have not obtained courtroom-ready evidence in the absence of the assistance of any formal authority, then you may be mentally ill.
Consider the various national security threats and societal risks that could be associated with difficulties to submit information that could be acted upon towards the following sort of situation on the part of any individual or entity embedded within the state and perpetrating whatever variety of harms they may have planned (i.e. conspired) to perpetrate.
The scenario involves manipulations and tortures consistent with the
An individual and/or entity embedded in the state may propose to be attempting to help, to inform, to provide assistance, to procure benefits for a target being assaulted by a broad arsenal of Sovietesque and otherwise police state tools inclusive of a variety of neuroewapons. The application of the assualt is precisely such an assistance. In particular, if it involves treatments which have previouly been repeated a great number of times in various manners, then continued application of a particular program of mental tortures, etc., is merely to be understood as further assitance toward an understanding of these tortures.
One should appreciate the fact of the helpers having helped with the benevolent ongoing applications of said tortures. It will help you to understand.
In the present day, such threats could proliferate widely, thus enabling substantial foreign and/or domestic threats to accumulate due to the lack of effective means of ensuring that actors will be empowered to take action to provide potentially actionable information in relation to such events.
Russia, for example, and/or hidden fascists in the West and related elements embedded in states (and/or other such types), could theoretically do many many things which could lead to control over a substantial share of society, potentially leading so far as to a complete subversion on revolutionary scale, with an essentially completely degraded ability of members of the general public to be assured in their safety if forwarding information which may be actionable for said security risks.
The Washington Post reported on the question of ‘where did 10,000 blackmail and brainwash experts from Eastern Europe ever get to after 1990?’ Without wanting to distract from whatever more domestically originated issues may be at play, the inability of the general public to foward information (consider that you’re more likely to be looked up and investigated yourself, than for such information to be taken as information) to offices which can use information in a potentially legally actionable manner in relation to ‘blackmail and brainwash experts’ or any such thing, is more than a little bit suspicious.
Our domestic ‘blackmail and brainwash experts’ should be more attentive to the open/closed realities of the world, and reconsider how to better align their activities with stated objectives of resource allocations related to activities undertaken within (and/or heavily influenced by) structures of the state.